<body>

In the world where technology serves as a convenience store to the human race, is there little hope left for the printed word? What does the future hold for magazines, newspapers, and books in the middle of its gyrating competition with their electronic counterparts? Witness history as eleven students take the challenge to voice out their opinions on the status of the print industry. Read, listen, see and believe.

The Fine Print is an online publication owned by a group of Communication Arts students from De La Salle University Manila in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course subject Introduction to Print (INTPRIN). Any unauthorized distribution of content indicated in this site will be heavily penalized.

Categories

Posts by Contributor

Sponsors
The Fine Print, in cooperation with Read the Printed Word, would like to encourage you avid readers to join the campaign in preserving the good old way of reading.

Read the Printed Word!

Information
The views expressed in this website are attributed to its respective authors and do not necessarily represent The Fine Print and De La Salle University - Manila. Special thanks to Afeeqah for the website layout. Copyright 2012-2013.

Revival of Books
written on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 @ 3:52 PM ✈

Marielle Lee
11209682
INTPRIN A51

Revival of Books
Books now reached the technological era with the making of the increasingly popular e-book layout. But before this came about, books had to go through a long but significant evolution, which made it what it is today.
It is believed that the very first attempts to record symbols or writings onto moveable materials dating back to the 2050 BC were on clay tablets and papyrus scrolls. Clay was easily accessible during those times and became the writing material of the temple scribes. They used a style of writing known as cuneiform- the earliest known writing system in the world. Clay tablets, dried hard in the sun, make an almost unbreakable temple archive. But are not so convenient in sending messages. (Gascoigne, 2001) Papyrus scrolls, getting its name from an aquatic plant, had a flexible smooth surface, which allows and retains ink without smudging. Almost every book in the ancient civilization of Egypt, Rome and Greece made use a papyrus of this sort. (Gascoigne, 2001) A counterpart of this papyrus scroll namely bamboo, an indigenous plant in China, shares the same convenience as the prior. Chinese characters during this period are written in vertical columns. The modern-day Chinese characters for a book evolved from a pictogram of bamboo strips threaded together. (Gascoigne, 2001) The Romans around the second century A.D. however developed parchment that was easily browseable with its flexible double surface and is made of leather. (Gascoigne, 2001) It is the material used in all famous illuminated manuscripts produced in the monasteries. Within a book, the reader can move about freely and modern habits of information retrieval became possible like index references to numbered pages. (Gascoigne, 2001)  Collections of medieval manuscripts provide evidence of the growth of the book preceding printing. Since the development of the printing press in Mainz, Germany, book production in Europe has grown, which led to a revolution in publishing and to the printed book.
Throughout history, books have been used to spread ideas through print and affect people’s thoughts and behaviors. Paper books that started out as clay tablets are now evolved into what we all know as e-books. With today’s commercialized society and high-tech global economy, e-books or digital books have become the new craze with it having a multitude of internet-connected features which leaves the old medium of paper books crumbling. The debate between paperback books vs. e-books has been going about for several years now and it seems to many that e-readers are the sworn victors. So the question remains, will paper books cease to exist in the future?
Paper books with its intrinsic features are actually technological objects that have countless advantages as compared to those portable digital books. One of which is that “non-computer-literate” members of society are able to use printed books since it has a consistent easy to learn user-interface. Only a fraction of the world has access to the Internet, let alone e-books. Paper books are also readable with any form of light and are not battery operated. (Bohn, 2012) Another is that the feel of paperback books give a sense of ownership to a person and enables him to have a tangible collection of books on shelves. “The Books show where our minds have traveled”. (Couts, 2013) These books are easier to handle and are easier on the eyes since there is an absence of distracting user interface like pop up tasks, notifications and the like. It provides direct interaction with a highlighter and pen when in need of notes. It is crash proof and is also immune to viruses. Paper books are DRM-free/digital rights management-free for easy lending and resale since there is no intervention of a third party. (Bohn, 2012) Reading from this medium is generally healthier for our body specifically the eyes and mind. Most importantly, paper books last thousands of years if not more. (Bohn, 2012)
These advantages are either incomparable or poorly matched by the said e-book design. Although digital readers also offer numerous advantages over the paperback books, it is arguable how most of those mentioned above are necessary to how people engage in active reading—marking up or evaluating notes that catches the reader’s attention by highlighting, underlining or folding a page. Essentially, several of these are central to how most cultures are able to preserve and disseminate information for thousands of years. (Bohn, 2012) Paper books, if preserved well and is not too acidic can last more than thousands of years as compared to digital readers, which will physically break down in a matter of years. This goes to show that books still have a fighting chance of surviving. Its inherent traditional qualities actually give its competitive edge over those e-readers that have made their mark in the publishing world.
A philosophical belief raised by Lowery and Defleur called the Individual Differences theory provides an explanation as to why people prefer e-books instead of paperback books or vice versa and what influences them to choose the particular medium. The theory states that due to the variation in a person’s psychological makeup and opinions of things or ideas, media influence differs from one person to another. To be more exact, “Media and its messages contain particular stimulus attributes that have differential interaction with personality characteristics of members of the audience. (DeFleur, 1970 p.122) With this being said, people choose the specific platform in relation to their specific needs. Paper Book advocates choose the medium perhaps for convenience, practicality and the e-book fans for functionality and maybe peer pressure. Also, books may offer information that are not available for digital readers. The possibilities are endless. The choice in short depends on numerous factors including a person’s environment, culture and beliefs.
To test this theory, a set of people, that ranged from 16-27 years old, were asked to answer a quick survey about how they typically read their books and which attributes of print media do they find appealing. Results showed that 67% of the voters preferred hardbound or paperback books. And surprisingly, only 21% of the respondents use e-book layout. As for the appealing attributes, 37% opted for the design, 36% for the credibility of content, 15% for the price, 10% for interactive reasons and 2% for other reasons.
So going back to the question raised earlier, will books cease to exist? The answer is no, even with a slight decline of paperback users, books will never perish and this truth is backed up with the above statements. There will always be that person who will prefer the traditional type of books. Books will live on and exist long enough for our grandchild’s great grandchildren to appreciate. It is true though that higher technology has reduced people’s motives for sticking to old fashion paper, but if one looks at it in a longer perspective, paperback books can last a thousand years and are for long-term archives. (Bohn, 2012) I think what we can do as media practitioners and an audience is to give enough attention to the very things that made the paper book industry survive and flourish (Bohn, 2012). As Martial Macluhan would reiterate it, medium is the message. Do we really want to be known as non-linear thinkers? Together, let us revive paper books in its former glory and change the course of history.

Sources:

  • “The Evolution of the Book.” SFBookReviews. N.p. 1999. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
  • “History of book.” State Library of Victoria. N.P. 2013. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
  • Gascoigne, bamber. “History of Writing Materials.” HistoryWorld. N.p. 2001. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
  • Andrewcouts [Andrew Couts]. “Re: Is there any reason to own paper books beside showing off? Not really.” DigitalTrends. Designtechnica Corporation. 26 Oct. 2013. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
  • Dieter Bohn [backlon]. “Re: “Sorry iBooks, Paper Books still Win on Specs.” theverge. Vox media. 20 January 2012. 9 Dec. 2013.
  • Darnton, Robert. “What is the History of Books?” Daedalus 1982. : 65-66. JSTOR. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.

Labels: ,


0 comment[s] | back to top